Polcompball Wiki
Advertisement
Polcompball Wiki

A Political Compass refers to any form of diagram which puts Political Ideologies across a set of spectrums. Within the Polcompball canon it is often portrayed as the place on which the characters reside.

History

The conception of categorising political ideologies in a way we commonly understand today (Left-Vs.-Right) started with the French Revolution in which those who supported traditional French society (eg: Supporters of the Monarch.png Monarchy, Catheo.png the first estate and Feud.png the second estate) sat on the right and those who supported to abandon these principles in favour of Republicanismpix.png Republicanism and areligiosity sat on the left (With the left being further divided into the Girondi.png moderate and Jack.png radical factions).

After a good while of such a system being adopted a lot of people who dealt with categorising politics found a lot of problems with that systems, thus they started to come up with other systems to better categorize political ideologies.

Placement

A common misconception regarding the standard Political Compass and its ideology placements include fusing the cultural (progressive/conservative) and economic (left/right) axes, with the assumption that culturally progressive ideologies are economically left-wing while culturally conservative ideologies are economically right-wing. Under this model, the economic right supports or enforces a market-based economy, property-owner sovereignty, and seldom engages in economic redistribution. The economic left" supports or enforces wealth redistribution, worker or collective control of the means of production, and the expansion of a welfare system.

For example, an ideology such as Neoliberal-icon.png Neoliberalism, which is economically right-wing but culturally progressive, would be placed in the right wing of the compass, which disregards cultural placements due to the unavailability of a third axis on a two-dimensional diagram. Similarly, the culturally conservative but economically left-wing Nazbol.png National Bolshevism finds itself on the left wing of the compass.

Models

Centrist-yellow.png The Compass Model

Political Compass2.png

The Compass Model is the most commonly used within colloquial speech in the Polcompball community. This model is a square with a specifically Left-Right which is strictly economic (Soc.pngSocialism vs. Cap.pngCapitalism) and a Top-Bottom civic axis which puts those who Sec.png support the state at the top and Liberty.png those who oppose it at the bottom. Forming 4 quadrants: Authleft.png Authleft, Authright.png Authright, Libright-yellow.png Libright, Libleft.png Libleft which in some versions is expanded with Rightunity-yellow.png Right, Leftunity.png Left, Authunity.png Auth, Libunity-yellow.png Lib and Centrist-yellow.png Center.

Nolan.png The Nolan Model

Nolan Chart.png

The Nolan Model is a model very similar to the standard model, mostly used within certain Libertarian.png Right-Libertarian circles rephrasing both axes as questions of Economic Freedom Vs. Control and Social Freedom vs. Control. Forming the same axes as the standard model, the chart is also rotated 135 degrees counter-clockwise as compared to the standard model.

The chart was created in 1971 by David Nolan who was one of the founders of the U.S. Libertarian Party, this model is used by the World's Smallest Political Quiz.

Line.png The Spectrum Model

LeftVRight.jpg

The Spectrum Model is the most common political model within contemporary politics with there being just a Left and Right in the same vein as in the French Revolution. It is similar to the Compass Model as it is usually run on Socialism vs. Capitalism. Although the basis for it can be whatever and is not limited to necessarily to the same concepts as the French Revolution or Socialism vs. Capitalism.

Horshoe.png

Horshu.png The Horseshoe Model

The Horseshoe Model is a political model that expands on the line model, it notices that under certain circumstances the far-left and the far-right is in certain respect more similar to each other than they are to the centre, thus twisting the line into a horseshoe shape.

Fish.jpg

Fishh.png The Fishhook Model

The Fishhook Model is a response to the horseshoe model from leftists or rightists who view respective points on the model of the far left, centre, and the far right through the lens of class/socio-economic conditions. It states that the centre and the opposite side are both more similar to each other than they are both to their side, twisting the shape of the line into a fish hook shape.

Triang.pngThe Triangle Model

Triangle.png

The Triangle Model is a model of politics that notices that in politics there are each not dependant ideologically on each other and more of form a triangle with Soc.png Socialists on one side, Conserv.png Conservatives Con-t.png on the other and Cap.png Market Liberals on the yet another.

Nrx.pngNRx is fond of this model as it maps neatly into the european conception of the 3 estates, with there being a Traditionalist Right for the first estate (clergy), The Techno-Commercialist Right for the second estate (nobility) and the Nationalist Right for the third estate (the common people).

Polcube.png The Political Cube

CUBE.png

The Political Cube is an expansion on the standard model, it primarily notices that people that while having the same stances on the role of the state and the economy, they can still be significantly divided over the topic of culture and may even decide to side with people from other quadrants because of it. Thus it ads one more axis to that model; The Cultural Axis. Turning the model into a 3D cube.

This third axis can be largely defined by the belief over what should be the role of Heritage within society. With the Trad.png Right being Pro-Heritage, believing it to be a necessary and moral part of Human societies and the Prgess.png Left which is against Heritage, believing it to be a impediment to Societal Progress.

Sliders.png Slider-based Models

8V.png

Sometimes even 3 axes aren't enough and because we live in a 3-Dimensional World a "Political Tesseract" wouldn't be exactly easy to read. The solution to this problem that online quiz-makers came up with is to slap a bunch of Line models next to each other and showing where and person/ideology fits within each one. The Slider model is known for being satirized by Jreg in one of his videos in which he stacks One Hundred of them together creating something of a monstrosity. Which is visualized by this graph.

The picture shown on the left is an 8values, the most commonly used of the models. For this one, each result with the values all at 50%, which features 4 sliders, with 8 political values for two of these values for each of those 4 sliders. These sliders are the economic (Equality vs Markets), diplomatic (Nation vs World), civil (Liberty vs Authority) and societal (Tradition vs Progress) axes. For more on 8values, explaining what each value means and other slider models, see Values.

Radarf.png The Radar Model

Radar.png

A Radar Model is a less space-intensive alternative to a slider model, which puts the axes next to each to form a Polygonal shape and then forms a blob to symbolize where a person falls on each one of the axes.

This model is used by the "political simulator" Filteries.

Perceval index

https://images.app.goo.gl/h2WNDz2Kzbi3YgdV9

More Information

Wikipedia